Why Your Workplace Communication Training Is Probably Making Things Worse (And What Actually Works)

Connect with us: SB Nation | Woodworking Talk | Medium | Doodle or Die | Pexels

Three months ago, I watched a perfectly functional accounts team turn into a dysfunctional mess after their manager sent them through what she called "comprehensive communication training." By week two, everyone was using buzzwords like "circle back" and "touch base" instead of just saying what they bloody well meant. The department's productivity dropped 23%, and two people quit.

Here's the uncomfortable truth nobody wants to admit about workplace communication training: most of it creates more problems than it solves.

I've been running training programs across Australia for the better part of two decades, and I've seen this pattern repeat itself in offices from Perth to Brisbane. Companies spend thousands on communication workshops that teach people to communicate like robots, then wonder why their workplace culture feels artificial and stilted.

The Real Problem With Most Communication Training

Let me tell you what's wrong with 90% of the communication training happening in Australian workplaces right now. It's designed by people who've never actually worked in the industries they're training. They come in with their PowerPoints and their role-playing exercises, teaching customer service representatives to speak like they're hosting a morning TV show.

I remember one particular session I observed in Melbourne where the trainer spent forty-five minutes teaching a group of tradies how to use "I" statements. These were blokes who'd been communicating perfectly fine with clients for years, suddenly being told they needed to restructure every sentence to sound more "emotionally intelligent."

The result? Confusion, resentment, and a workforce that felt like their natural communication style was somehow deficient.

But here's where it gets interesting. The companies that see real improvements from communication training aren't the ones following the standard corporate playbook. They're the ones willing to challenge conventional wisdom and focus on what actually matters.

What Actually Works (And Why Nobody Talks About It)

Real communication improvement happens when you stop trying to change how people talk and start focusing on what they're actually trying to achieve. I've seen this work brilliantly at companies like Bunnings, where they train their staff to solve problems rather than follow scripts. Their team members communicate naturally because they understand their purpose.

The most effective communication training I've delivered focused on three simple principles: clarity, timing, and genuine interest in outcomes. None of this required people to abandon their natural speaking patterns or memorise corporate phrases.

Here's something that might surprise you: some of the best communicators I know in business would fail most formal communication assessments. They interrupt people, they use industry jargon, and they don't always structure their thoughts perfectly. But they get results because they understand their audience and they care about solving problems.

Take the mining industry, for instance. The communication style that works on a construction site in the Pilbara is completely different from what works in a Sydney law firm. Yet most training programs try to apply the same generic principles everywhere. It's like trying to use the same wrench for every bolt.

The Australian Context (That Most Trainers Ignore)

Australian workplace communication has its own unique characteristics that international training providers consistently miss. We value directness, we're suspicious of over-formality, and we respond better to practical examples than theoretical frameworks.

I learned this the hard way early in my career when I tried to implement an American-designed program in a Brisbane manufacturing plant. The workers saw right through the corporate speak and dismissed the entire initiative as "management wank." They weren't wrong.

The breakthrough came when we started using actual workplace scenarios from their industry. Instead of role-playing generic customer complaints, we worked through real situations they faced daily: dealing with supply chain delays, explaining technical problems to non-technical managers, and communicating safety concerns without sounding like killjoys.

Suddenly, the same people who'd been resistant to "communication improvement" were actively participating and sharing strategies that actually worked.

Why Most Programs Get Feedback Wrong

Here's another contentious opinion: most workplace communication training puts way too much emphasis on giving feedback nicely and not nearly enough on receiving it effectively. I've seen countless hours wasted teaching managers the "feedback sandwich" method while completely ignoring the fact that their team members don't know how to process or act on the feedback they receive.

The reality is that receiving feedback well is a skill that affects far more workplace interactions than giving it. Yet it's barely covered in most programs.

I once worked with a sales team in Adelaide where the manager had been through three different feedback training courses. He could deliver criticism like a diplomat, but his team was still making the same mistakes because nobody had taught them how to translate feedback into behavioural change.

We spent one afternoon on a simple framework for processing feedback: listen completely, ask clarifying questions, summarise what you heard, and identify specific actions you'll take. Revenue increased 18% over the next quarter, not because the manager improved his delivery, but because his team finally understood how to use what they were hearing.

The Technology Trap

Don't get me started on companies that think communication problems can be solved with better technology. I've watched organisations spend fortunes on collaboration platforms and communication apps while their fundamental problems remain unchanged.

Technology amplifies existing communication patterns – it doesn't fix them.

If your team struggles with unclear expectations in face-to-face meetings, giving them Slack isn't going to solve anything. You'll just have unclear expectations delivered through a different channel, probably with more confusion because tone is harder to convey in writing.

The most effective workplace communication training I've seen addresses the human elements first: understanding your audience, clarifying your objectives, and checking that your message was received as intended. Master these basics, and the technology becomes a useful tool rather than a expensive distraction.

What Success Actually Looks Like

Here's how you know communication training has worked: people stop talking about communication and start talking about results. When I visit companies six months after delivering effective training, nobody mentions the workshops. They talk about projects that ran smoother, conflicts that got resolved faster, and customers who felt better understood.

Real communication improvement is invisible. It shows up in reduced email chains, fewer misunderstandings, and meetings that actually achieve their objectives. It doesn't show up in people suddenly using corporate jargon or following rigid conversation formulas.

I remember visiting a Perth construction company a year after we'd worked together. The site supervisor mentioned casually that they hadn't had a safety incident in eight months. When I asked what changed, he said, "The boys just communicate better now about potential problems." He didn't mention techniques or frameworks – he just described a workplace where people felt comfortable speaking up when something wasn't right.

That's what effective communication training achieves.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Resistance

Most training fails because it tries to overcome resistance instead of understanding it. When people push back against communication training, they're usually protecting something valuable: their authenticity, their established relationships, or their proven methods.

Smart trainers work with this resistance, not against it.

I've had electricians tell me they didn't need to improve their communication because their customers understood them fine. Instead of arguing, I asked them to describe their most challenging customer interactions. Turned out they had plenty of room for improvement – they just didn't want to change what already worked.

We focused on expanding their repertoire, not replacing it. They kept their direct, practical communication style and added some techniques for dealing with more difficult situations. Six months later, customer complaints dropped 31% and their job satisfaction increased because they felt more confident handling tricky conversations.

Moving Forward: What You Should Actually Do

If you're responsible for communication training in your organisation, start by auditing what's actually happening. Spend time observing real interactions, not just reviewing customer feedback scores or employee satisfaction surveys.

Look for patterns in miscommunication. Are problems happening at specific handoff points? Do certain teams consistently misunderstand each other? Are customer complaints revealing gaps between what staff think they're communicating and what clients are actually hearing?

Most importantly, talk to your people about what they find difficult about communication at work. Their answers will be far more valuable than any generic training curriculum.

The best professional development training acknowledges that your people already know how to communicate – they just need help doing it more effectively in specific workplace contexts.

Build on their strengths instead of trying to rebuild them from scratch. Focus on practical skills they can use immediately rather than theoretical frameworks they'll forget by Friday. And for the love of all that's holy, please stop making people role-play scenarios that bear no resemblance to their actual jobs.

Communication training that works feels less like training and more like problem-solving. It should leave people feeling more confident about handling difficult conversations, not more confused about how they're supposed to talk.

The goal isn't to create a workplace full of communication robots. It's to create an environment where people can express themselves clearly, understand each other better, and get things done without unnecessary confusion or conflict.

That's communication training worth investing in.